Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 22, 2026.
Public comments (9)
The civil engineer for the Swarthmore project explained grading, stormwater retention plans, and coordination with the fire department regarding cul-de-sac turnaround requirements.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:22:21 →A long-time neighborhood resident expressed deep concern over wildfire risks, landslides, and the loss of natural open space and wildlife habitat.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:28:01 →A resident questioned emergency vehicle access on the narrow 18-foot driveway and raised concerns about lack of guest parking for large families.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 2:27:02 →A former city commissioner urged the board to reject the projects, citing a historic 1993 City Council decision that denied development on the same hillside due to safety and environmental risks.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:34:54 →A College Hills resident questioned why a full environmental impact report was not required, highlighting construction noise, dust, and severe wildfire evacuation risks.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:35:04 →A College Hills Association board member strongly objected to the project, sharing personal trauma from past fires and warning that adding density to a dead-end street threatens evacuation safety.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:38:41 →A resident living near the intersection of Swarthmore and Avonok expressed worry over fire hazards, unstable sandy soils, and wildlife disruption.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 2:51:00 →A representative of the Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy spoke about the site being an active wildlife corridor and warned that required defensible space clearing will destroy native habitat.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:45:38 →The applicant spoke in defense of the project, stating his family plans to live there and that all fire safety and building codes will be strictly met.
Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:49:38 →