O
Glendale
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Swarthmore Drive Projects

Glendale

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (5)Concerned (2)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
9
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 22, 2026.

Public comments (9)

NeutralHeik Marty RossianJan 22, 2026

The civil engineer for the Swarthmore project explained grading, stormwater retention plans, and coordination with the fire department regarding cul-de-sac turnaround requirements.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:22:21 →
OpposedAnne Marie SmithJan 22, 2026

A long-time neighborhood resident expressed deep concern over wildfire risks, landslides, and the loss of natural open space and wildlife habitat.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:28:01 →
ConcernedAlan ArzunyanJan 22, 2026

A resident questioned emergency vehicle access on the narrow 18-foot driveway and raised concerns about lack of guest parking for large families.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 2:27:02 →
OpposedMaro YakubyanJan 22, 2026

A former city commissioner urged the board to reject the projects, citing a historic 1993 City Council decision that denied development on the same hillside due to safety and environmental risks.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:34:54 →
ConcernedSusan Bruce SalianJan 22, 2026

A College Hills resident questioned why a full environmental impact report was not required, highlighting construction noise, dust, and severe wildfire evacuation risks.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:35:04 →
OpposedMichael BergmanJan 22, 2026

A College Hills Association board member strongly objected to the project, sharing personal trauma from past fires and warning that adding density to a dead-end street threatens evacuation safety.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:38:41 →
OpposedNancy KleinJan 22, 2026

A resident living near the intersection of Swarthmore and Avonok expressed worry over fire hazards, unstable sandy soils, and wildlife disruption.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 2:51:00 →
OpposedTim MartinezJan 22, 2026

A representative of the Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy spoke about the site being an active wildlife corridor and warned that required defensible space clearing will destroy native habitat.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:45:38 →
SupportivePaul VoscanyanJan 22, 2026

The applicant spoke in defense of the project, stating his family plans to live there and that all fire safety and building codes will be strictly met.

Design Review Board - Jan 22, 2026 · 1:49:38 →